When it comes to cigarettes, Stanford Law School professor Robert L. Rabin says “thank you for not smoking.”
#1By herfwy (Unregistered User)8:42am on April 9, 2008
Those smokers, such a danger to public safety. Where are the taxes, tariffs and litigation against alchohol companies? I'm quite sure they've caused more damage to public health, caused more damage to families, and cost more danger to society than the tobacco fiends. The only problem is most anti-smokers have no problem having those two or three glasses of wine before they drive. These health zealots want to control the everyday life through punitive taxes and litigation. Strange how thier own little "habit" never seems to be taxed or mentioned. Who would you rathe have behind the wheel? A wild eyed "smoker", or that pompous academic after his 3rd glass of port?
Those smokers, such a danger to public safety. Where are the taxes, tariffs and litigation against alchohol companies? I'm quite sure they've caused more damage to public health, caused more damage to families, and cost more danger to society than the tobacco fiends. The only problem is most anti-smokers have no problem having those two or three glasses of wine before they drive. These health zealots want to control the everyday life through punitive taxes and litigation. Strange how thier own little "habit" never seems to be taxed or mentioned. Who would you rathe have behind the wheel? A wild eyed "smoker", or that pompous academic after his 3rd glass of port?