Women’s Center seeks policy shift
Board members, administrators discuss changes to rape, harassment protocols
Women’s Center seeks policy shift
Board members, administrators discuss changes to rape, harassment protocols
Monday, January 28, 2008
Members of the Yale Women’s Center board of directors told the News over the weekend that they will push the University to change portions of the undergraduate regulations in order to address what they called “fraternity-sponsored or -enabled sexual harassment, assault and rape.”
In the wake of controversy over the circulation last week of a photograph in which students affiliated with the Zeta Psi fraternity are seen holding up a sign reading “We Love Yale Sluts” in front of the Women’s Center, the directors met with Yale College Dean’s Office administrators Thursday morning to discuss the possibility of such policy changes. Members of Zeta Psi also met with administrators last week to talk about how the fraternity could react to the incident, but chapter president John Charest ’10 said the group has not nailed down any concrete plans since the fraternity issued a public apology, which was published in the News last Tuesday.
Members of the Yale Women’s Center board met with administrators last week after the “We Love Yale Sluts” incident.
At a Wednesday afternoon meeting, members of the fraternity discussed ways that the organization can support and reach out to women at Yale.
Center board members, meanwhile, have indicated they may pursue legal action. More than 20 legal experts have offered aid to the Center over the past week, said Chase Olivarius-McAllister ’09, the Center’s former political-action coordinator.
But Center directors were vague as to what exactly that legal action would entail. The directors said they are still deciding whether to file a sexual-harassment suit. Olivarius-McAllister hinted that the Center might pursue additional legal channels but declined to elaborate further.
At the meeting with administrators, the Center requested that the University adopt a host of structural changes to address what it perceives to be fraternity-sponsored sexual harassment, assault and rape. Both the Center’s directors and administrators declined to specify what possible changes were discussed.
Dean of Student Affairs Marichal Gentry, who was among the administrators who met with the Women’s Center, neither confirmed nor denied that changes to University policy would be enacted, but he said administration dialogue with the Center will be ongoing.
“I think our conversations should continue,” he said. “There’s an opportunity here to look at the current structure, and there are people who are willing to sit and look at things to see what’s possible.”
Other administrators present at the meeting include Assistant Dean of Yale College Edgar Letriz and Professor Maria Trumpler, director of undergraduate studies for Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and special advisor to the administration for LGBTQ issues.
But several members of the fraternity community, including Sigma Alpha Epsilon president RJ Price ’09, argued that the push for such changes exaggerates the extent of the problem on campus. Price said he has never witnessed “a single incident” of sexual harassment at SAE or any other Yale fraternity and said SAE had discussed sexual harassment earlier in the year at a forum the fraternity held for brothers and pledges.
“Not only are we not sponsoring or enabling, we’re actively preventing and actively condemning these kind of actions,” Price said. “We do not stand for this, we don’t support this and the fraternity system here does not condone sexual harassment and never has.”
Zeta Psi national organization Executive Director Dave Hunter said Friday that an investigation of the Yale chapter is underway and that a representative from the national organization was on campus Thursday to talk with members of the fraternity. If the fraternity is found to be in violation of the national organization’s risk-management policy — which expressly prohibits hazing and sexual assault — the fraternity could face a warning, a probationary period or suspension from the national organization.
The national disciplinary committee met this weekend to discuss courses of action, but Hunter said the process might take 30 to 60 days. Hunter could not be reached Sunday evening for additional comment on the results of those committee discussions.
“We’re going to be deliberate, which means it might take some time,” he said on Friday.
At a team meeting on Friday morning, head football coach Jack Siedlecki expressed his “extreme disappointment” about the incident, Siedlecki said. Zeta Psi’s membership has traditionally drawn heavily from the team.
“While I respect their right to freedom of speech, I am extremely disappointed that such a stupid act was not questioned by someone in the group,” Siedlecki said in an e-mail to the News. “I would hope that the individuals involved have learned that their flippant lack of respect has harmed the image of several groups on campus. We are all going to have to work very hard to get that respect back.”


Comments
None 4 years ago
The fraternity should be far more straightforward that what was not was not a big deal and that they should not apologize for it. At most, they could have taken out the picture in response to the outcry but really shouldn't have gone farther than this. As much as Yale is very far left politically, I still can't imagine that the average Yalie (male or female) would think that this is an issue, and I am not sure why we should let a small minority dictate all of the discourse.
Many conservative students are likewise offended by, say, mandatory sex education for freshmen, but hardly anyone cares that they be offended or not. If even mainstream conservatives are not taken seriously, I don't see why the most extreme leftists should be taken seriously.
Oh, and no, I was not in a fraternity.
None 4 years ago
About the article: Olivarius-McAllister tried to unionize prostitutes in New Haven last semester, and knows more about the law than most students in their third year of YLS because of it. (The one time that she came to the seminar she and I took last semester she quoted - in full and perfectly - four paragraphs of the CT statutes that pertained to brothels.) The reporter should take whatever it was that she "hinted at" pretty seriously.
About Comments #3 and #16: I read the column that Chase Olivarius-McAllister wrote on virginity last year, and it was so well-crafted and well-written that I remembered her (unbelievably long) name. I have just re-read it. In it, she simply says that our culture's conversation about sex is stupid, mundane, and misogynist. She absolutely did not advocate promiscuity, nor the loss of virginity. (Several people who know her well, by the way, have reported to me that she is opposed to intercourse, for feminist reasons that I never quite grasped.)
"Life, Liberty, and Morality" is desperate to portray her as something she is not. Though his depseration leads him to misrepresnt her, it understandable. Chase Olivarius-McAllister is an icon on this campus. Many people hate her, and many more have adored her.
There are other beauties, troublemakers, intellectuals, and feminists on this campus. But everyone focuses on Chase Olivarius-McAllister - especially those opposed to feminism - and as result people lose perspective, and talk about her like she is some sort of mythic character, and make her in to some sort of mythic character.
I did too. I thought, from being in class with her, that she was incapable of feeling fear. My roomates told me they thought so too. Last week, when I read the headlines about the WC and Zeta and the lawsuit, I knew that it could only be the work of THE Chase Olivarius-McAllister.
Last night she came to the YPU as a guest speaker in its debate on hate speech. When she stood behind the podium, and addressed the YPU - the unrepentent warrior for women - THE mythic Chase Olivarius-McAllister - was completely surprising. She was nervous; she was termbling; she could barely look up as she read from her speech. Towards the end of it, I wondered whether she was crying, or trying not to. The audience was absolutely hushed throughout - which is UNHEARD OF AT THE YPU. The speech was beautiful, so serious - the best that night, and in recent memory. But it moved the YPU because she meant every word that she said - it made her human to us.
I just re-read my comment, and I may have to take the same advice I am giving to Life, Liberty and Happiness: stop focusing on Chase Olivarius-McAllister.
None 4 years ago
@#14: How wonderful that you have such a rosy view of the term slut and drunken college boys, but how completely ridiculous to assume that your perception somehow implies a universal truth. The fact that there exist walk services or self defense does not change the fact that this was harassment.
Did you even begin to read the article? I ask because you completely neglect the WC's argument that fraternity culture, misogyny and sexual harassment are somewhat connected to sexual assault and rape. It is obvious to everyone but you that this incident is being used as an example of other wrongs, rather than standing on its own.
None 4 years ago
Danny boy, she did exactly that in an editorial http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/19666
She would like to frame the word choice in the debate however so that the word 'slut' can't be used to describe behavior that is... well, slutty. She wants to censor the other viewpoint which is: sleeping around isn't really respectable behavior.
The consequence of following her views in that editorial would be that women are viewed as sluts. We either honestly admit that men and women are different and that women who sleep around are viewed this way or we can silence dissenting opinions, or truthful observations (such as, men in fraternities truly appreciate yale sluts.)
None 4 years ago
That article doesn't say that being a virgin is necessarily wrong. It certainly does not call upon anyone to be promiscuous. It merely criticizes the culture and history of virginity, and displays the disparities between the virginities of men and women. A married couple comprised of two people who BOTH wait until marriage, for example, would not be objectionable in the same manner.
None 4 years ago
It is no use denying it. Our thought police know you are thinking evil things about women. You are dangerous and must be cast out to preserve the purity of our utopian community.
None 4 years ago
While we're on the subject, Sex Week at Yale IS sexual harassment and an assault on every student who received the unsolicited e-mails and will have to endure the promotion leading up to the week and the week. It's especially disturbing to those who value purity and monogamy.
Yes, we exist so consider us a minority group subject to minority protections.
None 4 years ago
Didn't Chase Olivarius-McCallister, one of the leaders of the YWC, write an article disparaging virginity and monogamy? Now she is rallying the troops against men who loudly appreciate such loose morals in women (the same ones she herself championed.)
Didn't she also lead a crass skit against the same fraternity who's pledges offended her sensibilities?
I'm confused. It almost sounds as if YWC has some problem with men in general and fraternities in particular not goosestepping to the Feminist national anthem.
None 4 years ago
I'm not a feminist and agree that the YWC are hypocrites. I DO think that Sex Week at Yale is sexual harassment far worse than what the YWC are claiming but who represents us?
None 4 years ago
I don't know Really Harassed, the YWC doesn't represent me as a woman. I guess it is like Orwell said "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal." Sleeping around garners women the respect and legal support of the YWC.
What if the sign had instead said "We love Yale's chaste virgins"?
Rallying for censorship has made the modern feminist movement is a sick parody of the early suffragettes.
None 4 years ago
"At the meeting with administrators, the Center requested that the University adopt a host of structural changes..."
Read as: $$$
Remember, similar tactics squeezed Harvard's Larry Summers for $50 mil; why wouldn't the same tactics work at old Yale?
Mo' money!
None 4 years ago
Dear Women's Center,
We were cool before, but now we thing you are nuts.
-Yale
None 4 years ago
Life liberty and morality wrote: "It almost sounds as if YWC has some problem with men in general and fraternities in particular not goosestepping to the Feminist national anthem." D'ya think? LOL!
None 4 years ago
Dear Women's Center,
You were cool before, you are cooler now, and Yale's women and men are proud of your work.
Keep giving them something to talk about.
BK '08
None 4 years ago
TO #2:
Ah, so true! But those of your bent are fit to be ridiculed? Chastity? Morality? How QUAINT! Ironically YOUR views will be absolutely discounted, as of no worth, no worth whatsoever. Your views are, I am sure you know, products of the patriarchal oppression--you do not understand your own suffering.
BTW: Compare the current situation (philosophically) with that of the regular trashing of "conservative" publications on campus. One can place outright smut in Woolsey, but G-d forbid the conservatives get access to free speech! Does Yale prosecute (or even investigate) the property crimes (potentially felonious, given the dollar cost of replacement)? Heck no!
Does the Women's Center stand up for all rights...or just THEIR rights, their pet rights? YOU be the judge.
Lastly: yes, a weird dichotomous viewpoint (Orwellian in its double-think) of girl-as-naif, in need of protection (e.g., "affirmative response for each move leading up to a sexual encounter" policies) versus I-am-full-on-adult-womyn, here me roar!
No logic, no rationality, insufficient perspective: guilty of the very "crimes" of which they accuse others.
Ah, well.
None 4 years ago
Dear #9,
7 called. It wants its joke back.
None 4 years ago
Wow. Reading this thread it looks almost like a group of fraternity brothers sat down and had a childish mass commenting rampage.
They're nuts! They want money! Thought police! Hypocrites!
Seriously people? Is that the best you can come up with?
A group of twenty or so fraternity members intimidated a woman trying to enter the women's center and undermined/ laughed at their cause. They tried to demoralize women, many who have been harassed and raped, and who are desperately working to achieve equality. Why don't you think it's a big deal? Why? Because you call girls sluts all the time behind close doors, because you think women should expect to be treated as sexual objects and you love doing it, and you think the idea of women trying to achieve respect for themselves as human beings is hillllarrrrious and should of course be mocked. Those money-grubbing slut/virgins!!!
You are an embarrassment to Yale and to yourselves.
Dear satan, #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #10 and #11 need their souls back.
None 4 years ago
“Not only are we not sponsoring or enabling, we’re actively preventing and actively condemning these kind of actions,” Price said. “We do not stand for this, we don’t support this and the fraternity system here does not condone sexual harassment and never has.”
Then the policy shouldn't be a problem to the frat.
None 4 years ago
My friends and I call each other sluts sometimes.... We love each other and it's a lot of fun. It's actually rather empowering to call yourself a slut. Almost every strong, confident woman has been called a slut. Perhaps it's time to embrace slut like we embrace bitch.
Also, if I was walking past that group of frat boys, I would have not even been disturbed. I know they wouldn't harm me. I'm more afraid of other people at night besides a group of drunken college boys. I've done that before, and they really don't do anything! They're usually harmless. If I am really afraid, I walk with other people or call walk. Why doesn't this girl do the same? Also, why doesn't she take self defense? It's really empowering too.
I think the YWC board is weaker than it wants to admit. It would show more strength by actually acting with some dignity rather than legal action when African Americans and gay men have faced worse on campus.
Or login with:
OpenID