Yale Daily News

The evolution of Tap Night

Last night was cold and clear, but it certainly wasn't quiet. Costumed bands of students hurtled across campus, going through the motions to gain acceptance into one of Yale's senior societies, the groups of roughly 15 students who meet every Thursday and Sunday evening in their last year of college.

Among the juniors strung out along Elm and High streets yesterday evening was a lady dressed as “Sailor Moon,” a man decked in a rhinestone petticoat and another dressed as Little Bo Peep. Members of Wolf’s Head howled periodically throughout the night. Both Scroll and Key and Skull and Bones whisked off juniors in swanky black limos.

photo

Juniors engage in Tap Night revelry.

“It’s a secret,” a masked student sitting on Old Campus said when questioned about what she was doing. But long before Tap Night — anywhere from a night to one month before — many prospective members interviewed said they generally knew which societies would be tapping them.

With the proliferation of new societies in recent years, the tap tradition — once confined to a single evening of membership offers and induction ceremonies — has developed into an intricate system of interviews, pre-taps and initiations. The process can last weeks, giving rising seniors much to speculate about long before Tap Night becomes a reality.

ACCEPT OR REJECT?

The first Tap Day was on May 23, 1879. Before that date, juniors invited to join Yale’s secret societies were visited in their dorm rooms and presented with the infamous “accept or reject?” by members of the senior class.

According to “Go To Your Room,” a guide to Yale’s secret societies written by Yale professor Loomis Havemayer in 1960, the first Tap Day took place on what is now Old Campus (by Durfee and Farnham halls), where members of the University community gathered to watch expectant juniors wait for potential taps. Senior society members approached those who hoped to be tapped at around 5 p.m. and hit them on the back, bellowing, “Go to your room,” at which point the juniors ran back to their rooms to confirm or reject the formal offers.

Yale professors and students alike felt that such a spectacle added insult to injury for those who were not tapped, Havemayer writes in his book.

“The maximum amount of chagrin is inflicted upon the largest possible number of students,” English professor Chauncey Tinker 1899 is quoted as saying in Havemayer’s book.

But the process remained in place until 1941 (except for a brief period of tapping in rooms during World War I), when Tap Day was moved to Branford College courtyard at the instruction of the Yale College Dean’s Office. Administrators charged admission for those wishing to watch the tap process. Societies took rooms in Branford, where juniors were tapped in private.

The Branford ceremony became defunct after 1952 and the societies began approaching prospective taps in their own rooms that same night in early spring.

In April and May 1970, the academic year was cut short as a result of Black Panther riots and the Students for a Democratic Society demonstrations. That year, societies tapped prospective members all throughout April, and, although Tap Night was reinstated the next year, the mold had been broken.

PRE-TAP BEFORE CONSENT

While today’s tap process still centers around Tap Night, this night of binding consent comes more than a week after Pre-Tap, held last Tuesday. On or around Pre-Tap night, societies inform potential junior members of their intent to tap them. This gives the senior societies a better understanding of which juniors will accept or reject their taps; the junior could join another society or choose to abstain from society life entirely.

And so Tap night, in its current state, is more of a formal induction of juniors into their societies, rather than a revealing process.

“I just had people call me and tell me before pre-tap night,” Isaiah DeLeon-Mares ’10 said of his selection into one of the “landed” secret societies with tombs or houses on campus.

After potential new members are informed of their invitation to join the society, either before pre-tap night or on pre-tap night itself, juniors spend the evening with the society and the other tapped individuals, either in the society meeting-place or around campus.

DeLeon-Mares said that after receiving taps from three separate societies, he participated in pre-tap activities with one society, which he asked to remain unnamed.

But last night, he said, he joined a different society.

“I went through pre-tap night, but I was told by an alum that nothing is binding until tap night,” he said of his relatively last-minute decision.

The pre-tap concept evolved a few decades ago, and one can only speculate how such a process came into formation. And the number of societies has certainly increased — from seven “landed” societies and another five or so underground societies in 1952 to nine “landed” societies and roughly three times that number of underground societies in 2009.

‘TAP NIGHT TWICE’

While there is no given record on the number of societies to date, pre-tap night gradually developed to give some order to an uncoordinated and growing system of organizations.

“It’s a way of figuring out who you can get,” said Andrew Liyana ’08, a member of Whiskey and Coke. The members of the society were seen stumbling towards Cross Campus late last night. “You have to figure around individuals who get tapped by more than one society. It would be problematic if you want 15 people but end up only getting eight.”

Liyana also added that the process is more enjoyable when extended. “In a sense, you get to have Tap Night twice. Why not?” he said.

This whole week, after all, was marked by a series of bizarre events around campus.

On Tuesday evening, Costumed students gave a poetry rendition in the Thain Family Café in Bass Library; Eliot Brady ’10 was seen giving drill instructions in Commons on Monday. An unknown male ran into Anders Winroth’s “Vikings” lecture on Monday wearing an adult diaper and another group of students disrupted William Summers’ “Biology of Gender and Sexuality” class on Tuesday to demonstrate how to put on a condom.

Still, even with pre-tap, some societies were in jeopardy of not filling all 15 spots on tap night if students rejected their offers last-minute. A junior who asked to remain anonymous was offered and subsequently turned down a Skull and Bones invitation Wednesday night.

But prospective Bonesmen were not likely that hard to find. Gabriel Perlman ’12, an onlooker on High Street, said he saw students outside of the Skull and Bones tomb force people into a limousine. “I heard some noises, quite sketchy,” he added.

Comments

None 2 years, 8 months ago

I'm dumbstruck when a Yalie comments that the societies are elitist. That Yalie should had matriculated at Columbia or Harvard, I suggest, after what I bet was four or three years at a public high school. If one enjoys what's common, don't seek admission to Yale College.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

I heard you just listen to a bunch of people talk about themselves for 8 hours each week, even in the big ones. This sounds hardly interesting at all...

Why can't we just have clubs that present essays? We already talk too much about ourselves here.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

You said:"I do think think that it's a little narrow to say that adversarial learning is the only useful style of learning..."

Now who ELSE said that. Because I certainly didn't, neither did I imply it. Go Re-read what I actually DID say/write (#22).

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

sickkk laxxxxxxxx I don't know how Manhasset got brought up on this thread, but I kind of love it.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

Hi,

I appreciate the concern which is been rose. The things need to be sorted out because it’s not about the individual but it can be with everyone.

<a href="http://auctions.fastrealestate.net">; foreclosures</a>

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

You said:"...but it's still an argument, and so structurally speaking much less about respecting other people as they are and much more about tearing other people down in order to prop yourself up. In a debate, you listen to the dude on the other side primarily to weed out his weaknesses."

Clearly you don't understand the purpose of debate. Its purpose it not to tear people down, as you claim, its purpose is to strengthen people's arguments by pointing out the flaws in their thinking/logic.

Just as your professors are not trying to tear you down when they grade and correct your written work, the debater is trying to build up her opponent by showing them that their oral presentation could be better if fixed the holes in the arguments proffered.

It might not feel good to be corrected, but those who willing put themselves in place to be critiqued come out of that process stronger and more capable to do what an educated person is suppose to be able to do.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

We spent the first two meetings talking about protocol and whether it would be appropriate to swear in conversations. At that point I left, never to return.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

roosevelt tap is the biggest joke of all time. everyone knows if you are remotely invovled in campus life and aren't a tool, you will get a tap and that being in a so-called "landed" society says very little about your experience in comparison to any other society. society is about the people and learning and growing senior year.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

That's actually debatable (ooh! a meta moment!). Learning by being corrected is certainly one way of learning, but there are other ways too. We can also learn a lot by making positive connections and building on each other's points, or sharing our perceptions in a non-judgmental fashion. Which is not to say that this is always useful, but I do think think that it's a little narrow to say that adversarial learning is the only useful style of learning, even for improving upon skills such as logic and oral argument that educated people are supposed to have. (A really interesting popularly accessible book relating to this topic is "The art of changing the brain" by James Zull)

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

This is #12.

What... you think I'm talking only about Societies?!

Colleges, baby. Elite, Private, Exclusive.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

I mean, as far as most of the unlanded societies go, sure, it's a lot of team/frat/friend mixing. Not a meritocracy. And frankly, I'd rather not be in one at all than the half-assed societies.

That said, as far as the landed groups go... most of the taplines include positions on campus held by very successful people. Say what you will about the supposed Toads crowd, but the womens crew tap in Bones is well deserved. We're talking future olympians. Same goes for the head of the YDN, or Roosevelt. We can debate what "merit" is, but most of the taps in "Big 3" are successful people... and that's the point.

And @16- Who says all change is good?

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

Who are the 2009 taps for Skull & Bones? Who was the intrepid junior that passed?

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

ROOSEVELT is a tap line now?

What a joke.

What's next, MAYA?

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

Word. I understand why people want to join societies, even beyond exclusivity - ready-made group of friends with whom to have meaningful conversations? Sweet! But I think if you look hard you can find diverse groups of thoughtful people on campus well before your senior year that, you know, are open to everyone. And it might mean you have to venture away from the YPU or some other status-obsessed group where people learn to talk instead of listening - but hey, what a learning experience that would be!

(And for the record, I am not a junior bitter about being left out. I am a sophomore who looks up to my older friends who have turned down senior societies, including Skull and Bones.)

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

... and, hence, justifying the acceptance of society offers nonetheless.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

Yo, I'm with #12. #10, going to Yale does not mean you unequivocally espouse elitist and capitalist values. As someone who was once on welfare and still made it to these hallowed halls, I can say that not everyone is from Manhasset. Secret societies are not meritocratic...you still have to get tapped. If you want to participate in them fine, but its not exactly scoring one for change

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

Actually, a number of societies (including bones) get recs from professors during the tap process.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

best societies are skull and bones, scroll and key, book and snake, wolf's head, manuscript, elihu, berzelius, mace & chain, and st. elmo's, no doubt.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

For the person mentioning the YPU - Seriously, we get like 2 taps, and none of them that big.

All I will say is the following: Frats and people at Toads tend to get into many a secret society.

This isn't meriocratic, and quite frankly, isn't trying to be.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

@14: you know what's funny? the ypu doesn't have a direct tap (some parties do), and ypu members over the last few years have an unusually bad track record on getting tapped in general. so for supposedly being "status-obsessed," i have a hard time understanding why someone would join the ypu unless they wanted to both talk and listen. as it is, it's a pretty even mix of tools and decent people, but both of them get tarred with the same brush, both by the societies and by pro-"meritocracy" folks like yourself.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

@#17: you mean to tell me that professors talk about a student's grades and performance in class when other students make inquiries? because that sounds pretty unethical to me. or do you mean that interviewees or pre-taps are asked to submit references? (which is obviously less objectionable, although quite toolish)

in any case, it doesn't make sense for societies to pick geniuses and community leaders if they're d-bags whom you wouldn't want to spend every thursday with. the social considerations would have to always come first.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

Okay, I'm sorry for making fun of the YPU. It wasn't nice, and I wouldn't say it to anyone's face in real life, so I shouldn't hurt people's feeling on the YDN comment board. I guess the reason I painted y'all with the same brush is because you're fond of doing things like going to Union League and, before it closed, Mory's - both of which are/were built around elitism and exclusion in a really big way, even if you just like having fun and toasting. I think that something similar could actually be said about the entire debate structure you follow; it's so formal and there are so many rules, so it's not particularly welcoming to someone not inculcated in your culture, and it's all about winning, besting someone else. I'll give you that listening has to occur in any argument, but it's still an argument, and so structurally speaking much less about respecting other people as they are and much more about tearing other people down in order to prop yourself up. In a debate, you listen to the dude on the other side primarily to weed out his weaknesses. Now, if you're listening to two other people debate, and I know that's what a lot of people spend time doing in the YPU, it's obviously a whole different ballgame. All this aside, however, just because I think the YPU is silly doesn't mean y'all don't have a good time, and probably a lot of people would think the stuff I spend my time doing is also silly, so ... I retract what I said. It was unkind.

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

Hate to break it to you, but if didn't want exclusivity, you should have gone to State U. Yale is to other colleges as societies are to the greater social scene. You chose one of the most selective, elite schools in the country. You have absolutely no right to criticize societies in this regard.

This debate happens every year, and at the end of the day, membership and ownership and fraternity are valid values. Exclusion happens in all facets of life. Regrettable. On the flip side, however, cultivating a group of talented people and forming those bonds is important. At least at Yale people get tapped for holding positions, contributing to the community, etc. Far more of a meritocracy than Princeton's Eating Clubs.

In other words, your argument is that the people in these societies don't deserve to be there. I can't imagine you would argue against accomplished people reaping the benefits of success. Again, that is what all of us are doing here at Yale.

There is an overall argument to be had against elitism and selectivity, but to do so you must also argue against Yale, the higher education system in general, capitalism, etc... which, since you went here, I doubt you do.

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

most societies are pretty stupid. When you can be in the same society as four of your closest friends, you know the entire process has gone downhill

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

Actually, some of us went to Elite Private Institutions so that we can rise among their ranks and then, once at the top, dismantle the system of privilege and elitism that exists systemically.

One step ahead of you!

0

None 2 years, 9 months ago

secret societies are meritocratic? hahaha. yeah, i'm sure they look at juniors' GPAs, test scores, recommendations, etc. as well. they're just social clubs. get over yourself.

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

old campus was definitely quite the place last night. everywhere I walked, there was something going on. i'm a freshmen, so this whole society stuff is so intriguing to me. is skull and bones really the best? or is it just for (certain) people with (certain) aspirations? are the ancient 8 really the only ones that matter?

i don't know. this is interesting stuff.

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

to the junior who turned down their Skull and Bones invitation, I salute you.

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

Kingman Brewster, is that you? I thought you were dead!

Seriously, take your stick-it-to-the-man, anti-system guilt elsewhere.

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

Are there really around 36 societies these days? That means close to half the senior class would be in one. Those who are left out must feel pretty bad.

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

this article provides no new information. It is just filler

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

If the YDN is correct about the numbers, this is getting a little ridiculous, and it's considerably worse than it was just a decade or so ago when I graduated.

By 'worse' I mean 'more of the senior class spending their time on this elitist junk.' I get that some people like their senior societies. But my feeling has always been, if you want exclusivity, status anxiety, and clubs that are hard to join, just go to Princeton! There's an entire school organized around this kind of social arragement. Part of what makes Yale great is that this kind of stuff is on the margin of the Yale social scene (chefly b/c it's only seniors).

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

My advice to #1 (frosh). Do not give a whit of thought to what senior society "matters". Craft your own interesting life at Yale, made up of people and subject matter which interest, stretch and create the new you. Chances are that if you focus on your own growth as a student and a person, some group will notice you and invite you to join for your senior year. Even if that doesn't happen you will have a full experience and won't have missed a thing. I went into one my senior year, enjoyed it and have kept in touch with many friends I met there then and later. But I would have had a fulfilling senior year without it, too, just different.

0

None 2 years, 10 months ago

Recent Alum isn't in a society!

0