Yale Daily News

Conservatives: Without a voice?

Conservatives at Yale have little to look forward to these days. Feeling stigmatized and silenced, some are searching for a community of peers, and not finding what they are looking for in Yale’s debating societies. Will these closet conservatives find their safe haven, or will they remain a silent minority?

On the eve of the inauguration, three young women are lounging in their fourth-floor Saybrook suite after dinner. As they sink into their couches, the conversation turns to politics. A stuffed elephant sits on a fireplace mantle above their heads.

photo

“It’s just a coincidence,” says one of the students, giggling about the toy.

The students said they sometimes struggle to identify themselves politically. “Conservative” does not cut it. The term is at once too expansive and too easy for others to pigeonhole.

“Maybe I’m a progressive conservative?” one suggests, and they all laugh at the contradiction.

They hesitate to label themselves “conservative” for another reason. On this campus, the term is loaded. At times, they feel uneasy talking about their conservative viewpoints among their friends.

“If you’re open about it, you’re going to be attacked,” one says, “but you want to have friends.”

“I bite my tongue a lot,” another adds.

The students asked to remain anonymous because they do not want their political views publicized.

Conservatives, without a doubt, form a much smaller community on this campus than they did a few decades ago. A recent News poll of 322 undergraduates found that while 67 percent of students describe themselves as liberal and 21 percent as moderate, only 12 percent of students call themselves conservative.

The conservative contingency in the faculty may be just as small, if not smaller. Professors said they could only name a handful of politically conservative colleagues.

“Among the faculty, there just isn’t any presence,” international studies lecturer Charles Hill said.

But conservatism at Yale is far from dead.

A conservative voice of a certain kind currently makes itself heard in editorials, debating societies and the monthly Yale Free Press. A small coterie of conservative undergraduates is trying to provide a voice for those who are “quieter and kind of ashamed,” in the words of Jeremy Schiffres ’11, a Conservative Party member. Yet some claim this group’s insularity and pomp scares off closet conservatives. As President Barack Obama’s administration gives the spotlight back to the liberals, alienated conservatives are looking for a welcoming, supportive community.

But they are not finding it at Yale.

Glory days

How times have changed.

Fifty years ago, Yale was different. The University was all-male and, until the 1950s, all white. Students hailed from the Northeast Corridor, attended private high schools, and wore jackets and ties to dinner every evening.

Alumni from past decades describe the campus as overwhelmingly conservative and Republican, perhaps even more so than the rest of the country. In his 1936 bid for re-election, Franklin D. Roosevelt carried 46 out of 48 states, including Connecticut. But according to a straw poll by the News, he lost Yale.

Retired Yale administrator Sam Chauncey ’57 said that after World War II, self-described Democrats were a rarity on campus. Yale historian and Larned Professor Emeritus of History Gaddis Smith ’54 GRD ’61 concurred, saying Yale faculty and administrators were openly Republican up through the 1950s.

It was during this era, after all, that William F. Buckley Jr. ’50 became the chairman of the News.

Little did Elis know that conservatism was on its way out. By the 1960s, Yale had transformed into a liberal campus. Under the presidency of Kingman Brewster Jr., Yale broadened its base of students, recruiting from a range of socioeconomic and minority groups. Anti-war demonstrations and civil rights protests soon rocked this campus. President John F. Kennedy Jr. spoke at the 1962 commencement ceremonies.

While conservatism saw a resurgence in the 1980s, making this campus more moderate politically, it never returned to its full glory. The euphoric celebrations over President Barack Obama’s victory are evidence of the campus’ strong liberal bent.

With conservatism in its most serious trough since the heady ’60s, Yale’s conservative students feel silenced.

At least one group, however, refuses to quiet down.

The Union

Bang bang bang.

With a few swift taps of a gavel, the Yale Political Union debate is underway.

Students gathered in William L. Harkness Hall on Wednesday evening for the annual YPU Gardner-White Prize debate. The winner of the debate — selected from 43 entrants by a panel of student judges — will receive free lifetime membership in the Union. The topic of the night is “Resolved: Tear down the White Picket Fence,” a referendum on the dominant American culture of the past 50 years.

This is not a typical meeting for the Union. At this event the students stand and sit in unorganized clusters. Anyone who has attended a YPU debate can tell you that they usually feature a prominent speaker in addition to student speakers and, perhaps even more noticeably, students seat themselves along party lines; right-leaning parties sit on the right side of auditoriums, left-leaning parties sit on the left.

On the right side, one is apt to see bow ties, cravats, and bottles of port and sherry. In the YPU, conservatives make themselves distinctive with a unique personal style.

“You can always spot the conservative students,” said political science professor and Branford Master Steven Smith. He added that he thinks conservative students in particular take pride in being a showy minority.

“There is nothing more boring than being another liberal on campus,” he said. “People don’t want to be forced into a mold.”

Through such exhibitionism, the parties loudly present themselves as the face of conservatism.

For these students, party membership shapes their social lives. When not attending YPU events, Party of the Right members hang out, throw parties, get into arguments and generally do “a lot of raising hell,” member Will Wilson ’09 said. Members of these groups either control or exert some kind of influence over almost every other conservative organization on campus, including the Yale College Republicans and Choose Life at Yale. Jordan Zimmerman ’12, a new member of the Independent Party, said she thinks the parties provide a backbone for conservative students on campus.

“A supportive community does exist in the form of a few parties in the YPU,” she insisted.

Yet despite being tied together by a common reverence for tradition, the three conservative parties, the Conservative Party, Tory Party and Party of the Right, are not quite one big, happy family.

Matthew Shaffer ’10, who said he left the Party of the Right last fall, sees tremendous factionalism within the YPU, which produces divisiveness among conservatives.

“There is no unified conservatism at Yale,” he said. “The level of rancor between and within the various parties is absolutely outrageous.”

But YPU President David Manners-Weber ’10 said reports of hostility are exaggerated.

“Stories about conservative infighting in the Union are largely overwrought,” he said.

Although right-leaning party leaders claim to welcome different points of view, many members said a degree of insularity is valued because it fosters productive debates. Some said heterogeneity, while potentially valuable too, can prove disruptive in small groups.

Tory Party member Matt Gerkin ’10 pointed out that his party requires all members to be conservative.

“If you don’t share something in common while debating, it is difficult to get beyond that,” he said.

“There’s sort of a philosophy about keeping the party pure,” Wilson said about the Party of the Right.

Ironically, the right-leaning parties of the YPU adhere to tradition in order to be different. They indulge in formalities and revel in old-fashioned ways. Inevitably, most liberal students are turned off by this behavior.

But they are not the only ones.

Failing to connect?

“It was the most self-serving, masturbatory display I had ever seen, and I swore I would never go back to another one ever again,” Michael Eggleston ’10 said.

Eggleston, a conservative, attended his first YPU debate as a freshman and was immediately repulsed, saying he never realized what “pompous windbag” truly meant before attending the event.

A number of conservative students expressed criticism about the brand of conservatism practiced in the YPU. Another student, who asked to remain anonymous, echoed Eggleston’s view.

“I believe the YPU caters to conservatives … the kind I aspire never to be,” the student said. “I, along with my like-minded peers, refrain from such affiliations.”

Students said they think the parties’ deliberate flamboyance drives away those seeking a welcoming community. Others said YPU conservatives, through their insularity and idiosyncrasies, create a barrier between themselves and the rest of the student body.

Lauren Blas ’09 said although she appreciates their provocative debates, she finds the parties’ methods a little theatrical for her taste.

“I think that in some ways they become a caricature of conservatism,” she said. “They put on a good show, but that’s not the kind of thing that I would particularly like to engage in.”

Liberal Party Chairman David Porter ’10 was more blunt. Porter, who describes himself as “far to the left,” explained that conservatives face great obstacles because liberalism dominates academia.

“Conservatism is not doing very well at Yale, and I don’t think it’s likely to recover anytime soon,” he said. “And as long as Yale’s conservatives confine themselves to places like the YPU, nobody is likely to think that what they do matters.”

But perhaps it would be too harsh to say these groups are failing to connect with the rest of the conservative community. Matt Gerken ’10, a member of the Tory Party, said his party is not necessarily on a mission to reach out to all conservative students in the first place. The Tory Party does not have proselytizing intentions, he said, though it tries to make a broad range of students feel welcome.

The Silent Minority

Some students claim that “conservative” is still a dirty word on this campus, and a new forum for dialogue could help to change this.

Yale College Republicans President Thomas Abell ’10, who hails from Mississippi, said he never thought of himself as politically conservative until he arrived at Yale, an environment in which the political center lies much further left than at home. Feeling that conservatism was stigmatized on Yale’s campus, he raised the issue with the dean of student affairs last year.

“There is definitely animosity here,” he told the News. “Some of us are sensitive about that sort of thing.”

Aside from the YPU and its affiliated groups, conservatives lack a supportive body on campus.

Some students suggested that a conservative publication could fill this void. But a conservative publication of sorts does exist. The Yale Free Press, founded in 1983, currently advertises itself on its blog as “the magazine of Yale University’s cadre of alienated conservatives.” But students generally regard the Free Press as a far-right or even libertarian publication rather than one that appeals to the entire conservative community.

Shaffer, who assumed the editorship of the publication last fall, said he is working on broadening its scope. He cited the August issue of the Yale Free Press, in which an editorial supporting Barack Obama appears alongside ones supporting John McCain and Bob Barr, as an example of his work to expand the audience of the publication. But he admitted recent issues have not been effective at drawing a wider audience.

“I’m trying to bring back the good ol’ days,” Shaffer said. “I want to welcome back the silent and embarrassed minority that exists underground.”

Zimmerman said she cannot think of any other group that would offer a support system for conservatives, aside from the YPU parties.

“Do we need more groups? I don’t think so,” Zimmerman said.

She said she fears that a new group could turn into a society that is “blockheaded and stubborn about their views.”

“I personally wouldn’t want that,” she said.

Currently, a small contingency of Elis remain in relative obscurity on this campus, reticent and isolated. For at least the next few years that a liberal president is in office, it looks like they will keep their heads down and bite their tongues. Blas, sitting in the Publick Cup, considers the difficult times ahead.

“Oh well,” she said, taking a sip of her coffee, “things have to get bad before they get any better.”

Comments

None 3 years ago

Always easy to figure out when the non-Yale crowd shows up: discussion goes down the tubes and EVERYTHING IS IN CAPS. Sheesh.

0

None 3 years ago

This is all symptomatic of the sad fact that (unless it's hard science) today's "education" at Yale is complete garbage - nothing more than indoctrination.

Given this current Yale climate, it should be no surprise that the Yale Free Press (a student written, conservative newspaper) gets regularly stolen en masse to prevent it from circulating.

0

None 3 years ago

The problem with most of you leftists is that you are belligerent, rude, condescending and display an arrogant lack of regard for any opinion other than one based upon your own self-serving, hypocritical, socialist set of ideals. You elitist frauds are obstructionists who are an integral part of a continuing crisis and not a solution. Go ahead and mock with your lies and deceit, for you will always be a negative force within this world; one that breeds disdain and embellishes the future, yet undone, evil deeds of others, perhaps some even done by yourself.

You neo-socialists have attempted to create a climate that inhibits the free expression of pro-American ideals and conservative thinking. I will never be seduced by your seductive increase-the-peace rhetoric. I will never be intimidated by your anti-American trash talk. And I will never be fooled by your lies and deceit. You will never succeed in your vain attempt to manipulate or squelch my thoughts and ideas or my American patriotism.

Today’s liberal is well defined.

Most liberal concepts and implemented strategies come straight from the Communist Manifesto wrapped in the paper-thin rhetoric of justness and fairness. But, it is you liberals who, for the most part, are too ignorant and unschooled to even realize it.

You, of the neo-Marxist left, are relentless in your assault against the pillars of America. If it weren’t so serious, you leftist's and your utopian ideals would be laughable. Your ideology has been a complete failure. Liberalism’s end result is corrosive to the very nature of the individual freedom the United States of America was founded upon. Again, due to sheer ignorance and a willingness to distort the truth, the average liberal doesn’t have a clear concept of what individual freedom consists of, or how it is properly derived. One thing is certain, individual rights are not found in the collective sense of socialism. History proves -again and again- that well-intentioned liberal programs, plans and ideas, often lead to disastrous results. The Marx/Engels derived ideology dances on the fringe of compassion and the jagged border of anarchy. Liberalism’s twisted logic and revolutionary zeal plague America and our cherished institutions. Like a cancer, liberalism threatens to destroy us from within. Liberalism exposes the tenets of socialism, not democracy!

The blatant ignorance displayed by today’s liberal is obscene. The fact of the matter is there is nothing liberal about you; you are illiberal in every sense of the word. Liberalism is a debilitating disease of the mind: it renders the backbone soft and blinds the eyes with distortion. Victims of this disease generally revert to a primitive herd mentality where you desire and seek comfort from other like-minded people. Together, you produce exaggerated conspiracies in a self-serving attempt to wage an intellectual quasi-war against an imaginary enemy. At this time, there is no known cure.

The bitter fruit of liberalism has produced a bumper crop of homegrown traitors. While Islamo-fascists try to cut the jugular within our neck, the ACLU, the National Lawyers Guild, and other radical left-wing organizations -along with you, their miserable minions- are stabbing us in the throat. Liberals openly challenge our elected government, compromise our national security, and strip America of her bed rock Judeo-Christian identity. As a whole, you leftists refuse to squarely face the at-hand threat of radical Islam and effectively deal with it in a head on manner. No, you want to pretend it is a benign culture difference and is more or less on the same plain as Christianity, and that all we really need to do to diffuse their stated hatred toward us is to be more tolerant, diverse, and broaden our scope of understanding.

The failed policies of liberalism may chip away at our basic foundation, but it enables others, who are far more dangerous, to do much worse – KILL.

Hey, for all of you supposed “civil libertarians” out there; libertarian refers to freedom, not despotism and cultural destruction!

The right to protest is one of the cherished freedoms protected by our Constitution. But there is a difference between protesting a point of view and intentionally working to disrupt and intimidate those with whom you disagree. The progressive movement attempts to intimidate and instills fear in an attempt to silence all opposing points of view. To them (you), the only good America is a crippled America. That is why you hate our military, our moral foundations, independence and sovereignty, and strength of character. And because of your hate of our conservative ideals, your fringe elements utilize media coverage to stab our troops in the back.

You liberals are prisoners. You live in a cage where liberal ideas –and only liberal ideas– are expressed. I suppose it is possible for many of you to never meet or listen to anybody outside of your own circle of like-minded liberals. And if there is a dissenting opinion raised within your cloistered environment, the person offering that opinion is generally laughed at and mocked for being an eccentric fundamentalist radical throwback from a more primitive time.

In the end, your intolerance is actually a reflection of your loss of clarity; your tolerance of virtually everything and your “anything goes” attitude is not a mark of liberalism, it’s a mark of the degeneration of your ability to judge anything.

The more you on the left scream about racism, homophobia, sexism, bigotry, no war for oil, Bush lied, Cheney/Halliburton, Islam is a peaceful religion, US imperialism, etcetera, the more I know that you are nothing more than a parrot in a cage mimicking what you’ve been taught. As such, you are a product of our society. You have been brainwashed since childhood from the left-wing garbage on TV, from what they indoctrinated you with in school, and from behaviors applauded in the upper institutions of “supposed" higher learning, i.e., Columbia, Yale, Harvard. A victim, you most certainly are!

History will soon prove that you, the neo-Marxist left, were nothing more than obstructionists to a more-free, civilized world.

0

None 3 years ago

MEN OF AMERICA: Stop the madness! IT IS your voice, your smarts, your grandfathers that wrote the laws, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, The Declaration of Independence! Woman has lost her place in society and has become a Jezebel/Vashti. If you keep listening to these leftists dictate to you, and NOT speak out, you will only have yourself to blame. What have you to lose at this point? Nothing! Everything is for gain by standing up like your fathers before you did, they stood AGAINST tyranny and said: "Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death!", "I regret that I have but one life to give for my country!", "We have not yet begun to fight!" Now, NOW is the time, to stop the madness of this leftism that has infiltrated, and root it OUT by standing up! "Men don't follow titles, they follow courage." (Character of Wallace in Braveheart) "Men, what we do in life, ECHOES in Eternity!" -Gladiator. SAVE THIS NATION.

Author: http://theamericanjuggernaut.lefora.com/forum/

0

None 3 years ago

If fair debates are allowed to take place than conservatives have nothing to worry about. Liberals have no ability to win them.

0

None 3 years ago

Bimpar, i hope that you don't go to yale. If you do your parents are wasting their money. Conservatives have all the right answers on the economy!Give people back their money! duh! And the rest of you liberals are going to be in for a surprise in 4 yrs(or less) Your "messiah" is a lying fake. Just look at all the broken promises already.Liberals live in a world of vapid ideals. Reality smacks them upside the head, and their too dumb to realize it. Iran will eat obamas lunch, and ultimately we will have to go to war, because of this "manchild" you elected.

0

None 3 years ago

As a conservative who DIDN'T join the YPU for the very reasons listed in the article, I can say that the YPU - not conservatives - have the real problem to deal with. YPU parties are too esoteric, too subcultured, and too bizarre for any normal person to deal with.

0

None 3 years ago

The comments posted by so-called "conservatives" in response to this article make it obvious why those who are intelligent and reasoned enough to get into Yale would not identify with such illogical statements.

"Iran will eat obamas lunch, and ultimately we will have to go to war, because of this "manchild" you elected."

"Pretty soon the liberals will begin

to round up americans and to let all the islamic terrorists walk free."

Really, now?

But on the other hand, the conservatives I have met at Yale are far more reasoned and thoughtful about their views. As someone who personally identifies with liberal ideology, I respect conservatives who are able to back up their opinions with facts and logic rather than the ad hom attacks and petty insults that litter this comment thread.

0

None 3 years ago

So Yale conservatives are afraid to be openly consrvative! Get a spine!! Just the other day I was around some liberals and one in snotty voice asked "What are you ? A conservative?" I responded by looking the little twerp right in the eye and said "Yeah! You got a problem with that!" He twitched and shut his mouth!

0

None 3 years ago

It's amazing that Roosevelt is alluded to as a conservative when his policies and actions as President certainly are are not conservative! But, hey, if his class was rich and white, then they must be conservative! Think we're being politically dishonest and possibly short-sided here.

0

None 3 years ago

YA, YOU LIBS CAN TALK THE TALK, BUT YOU CAN'T WALK THE WALK!! MOST OF YOU HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED. YOU GOT YOUR DICTATOR IN THE WHITE HOUSE WITH ALL HIS TAX CHEATERS. PESONALLY IF I HAD MY WAY, I WOULD AUDIT THE DEMS. AND REPLUBICANS. THEIR ALL A BUNCH OF CROOKS. YA, THE BIG SHOT DEMS WANTED THE REPLUBILCANS TO JOIN THE ON THE 1ST BAIL OUT SO THEY WOULDN'T GET ALL THE BLAME. IT'S NOT WORKING ON THE 2ND ONE !! TRY THINKING FOR YOURSELF, LISTEN TO THE TRUTH. RUSH,SAVAGE,HANITY,BECK. MAYBE YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH. BY THE WAY, I'M NOT A MEMBER OF THE DEM. OR REP. PARTY AND NEVER WILL BE.

0

None 3 years ago

Did Tony Blair feel lonely?

0

None 3 years ago

I guess they can't teach you to grow a pair in college.

0

None 3 years ago

It seems that to pass liberal muster, you need to enthusiastically support homosexuality. If we can't support normal, traditional concepts of human sexuality, how about neutrality: No gay pride days, just as we have no official gay shame days.

0

None 3 years ago

I have never felt more persecuted for being a conservative in my entire life than I did when I was at Yale-- especially by some of my professors. There was one instance in my Social Psychology class (PSYC150) on racism and other stereotypes when the professor asked, "Can you think of latent examples of other stereotypes, examples that don't always come to mind immediately?" The first few answers addressed sexism or ageism, and the professor took a few minutes to talk about each example as it was put forth... until I raised my hand.

Professor: "Yes, next example?" Me: "There's a strong bias at Yale against conservatives."

Suddenly, I could feel the piercing glares of my fellow students, the shifting and fidgeting in seats and a sudden deepening in the silence in Davies Auditorium.

Professor: "Oh really? And... uh... what is that bias??" Me: "Mostly that conservatives are stupid." Professor: "Oh, ok. Anyone else?"

No one mentioned it anymore for the rest of that class. I wonder why?

I have never felt more uncomfortable in my life than I did that day. So much for our proud claims of tolerance and diversity... it's a tolerance that is extended to everyone but conservatives.

0

None 3 years ago

Some people like having pride for their identities. We have days like the 4th of July when we flaunt our patriotism, holidays like Kwanzaa that were created to celebrate African-American identity. To ban someone from expressing their pride is akin to enforcing a "gay shame day."

That said, why must liberals "support" (whatever that means) homosexuality? Everyone is an individual and subscribes to his own ideology. I am gay, but I am much more conservative than you might expect.

In summary: everyone should have the right to express his own pride/beliefs. I can express gay pride and identify as "conservative"; you can be "liberal" and not like homosexuality. Done!

0

None 3 years ago

The average blue collar American does not like the Ivy League. We are sick of your holier than thou attitude and we rue the day we may run into one of you scum sucking privileged crap buckets. One day the common man will take the reins of this nation and bring back the prominence of the people by the people. Not of the people by the Ivy League. All of our "wonderful" leaders come from your halls and nothing more awful could be said about the product your trash machine spits out. Good Riddance to you all. Oh by the way to the webmaster thanks for the spell check.

0

None 3 years ago

this is the state of liberals now Pelozi and reid are stiffling americans right to "Patriotic dissent" to cough use a liberal traitors terms.

Liberals can get away with murder now. Liberals can get away with lying Cheating, robbery , racism the list is endless.

Liberals cannot stand though when anyone deares to question the GAG Messiah..

Liberls and obama will be the end of this nation.. we wont survive 4 months with obama in charge..

Pretty soon the liberals will begin to round up americans and to let all the islamic terrorists walk free.

0

None 3 years ago

It's a shame how intolerant "liberals" have shut down freedom of thought and expression at Yale to the point where ideas cannot be expressed. I'll be looking for a more "progressive" university to send my children too.

0

None 3 years ago

I work in the Fraud. The company I work for has nothing but homeosexuals and females in the Mid-Management Positions. I am gay and on the conservative right. I know your pain!

0

None 3 years ago

A degree from a university with such little balance is not worth the paper on which it is printed. What passes for education is simple indoctrination. Ivy League schools are vastly over-rated, as once confided in me by a Harvard MBA. I would never send my daughter to such a worthless bunch of schools.

0

None 3 years ago

I saw all of this when I got my degrees from the University of California. It made me sick and very sad.

Basically liberalism has become a dangerous movement filled with hysteria and stupidity, run by looters and second-handers that have no real skills, except to knock normal people.

0

None 3 years ago

Interesting how liberal policy and ideas were once the butt of a joke. Sadly, many of those policies are now the law of the land, or at least they probably soon will be. <> <> / (322) / <> <>

0

None 3 years ago

You poor ignorant empty children. Hearing the sad slide such a once great school has now taken, I'm reminded of the old classic, " Less Than Zero." You wise conservatives should be PROUDLY making known your positions. YOU are the smart ones. YOU are the ones who think in a TIMELESS manner. Those other less than zeros are nothing and mean nothing. They are the weak ones, who've been so easily brainwashed by a handful of possessed dummies in the far left medias. They have no opinion of their own. Only that which has been "socially engineered" into them by other empty ignorant blank people. Most of them come from empty homes just like in the novel. Rejoice in your wisdom ... and stay far from them ... lest you begin to care what they've been programmed to think of you !!!

0

None 3 years ago

There are liberal universities all over the country, yet in so many of them, a conservative opposition flourishes. If there can be a viable conservative movement at Berkeley (and there is), there can be a viable conservative movement anywhere. Yale conservative organizations need to reexamine their culture, structure, and methods of operation. They can do better if they try, but not without being willing to recognize that not all traditions are created equal and adapt to the situation they currently find themselves in.

0

None 3 years ago

@ yale '12 I'm just suggesting that's what follows from the article, I'm not at all sure it's really the case.

0

None 3 years ago

The article shows how bigoted and downright dumb academia has become. The Professor who can id a conservative a mile away, the members who think dressing like George Will and displaying props like overpriced liquor is not what a conservative be. And instead of having an inane debate title "Tear down the picket fences" seems more of a title for the Yale Rep. Perhaps a debate on Aynn Rand might be more appropriate, or what goes first the Buying a Home or having a good job to pay for said Home? If Yale does not have an a balanced faculty and student body what will its future alumni become a teachers college or training school for democratic party politicians and there lackeys? I recall an article in YDN titled "Should Yale be Free." with the endowment dropping how’s that going? How about all those projects being put on hold? And will these future progressives be as generous with their alumni donations? Final thought; Did Christopher Buckley's invite to speak at Class day been put in the mail only after he stayed from the reservation in the last weeks of the 08 election?

0

None 3 years ago

"It was during this era, after all, that William F. Buckley Jr. ’50 became the chairman of the News."

Yes, but didn't he then write a book essentially about how Yale was too liberal?

0

None 3 years ago

Ah, the crusading undergraduate reporter recapitulating the tired story of the Yale conservative toiling in obscurity and subservient to his traditions. That, at least, as a Yale alum used to say, is enough to keep liberals busy, Republicans at bay, and the nation free, or some such thing.

0

None 3 years ago

Indeed, God and Man at Yale was about how Yale was too liberal; what Buckley would have wanted was for Yale to actively promote Christianity and free markets. Yale was of course orders of magnitude more conservative, pro-market and pro-religion back then than it is now.

0

None 3 years ago

All conservatives need to do is stop trying to control basic human desires and develop some good ideas for the economy, rather than protecting a few favored industries. Look to Buckley as a model rather than Limbaugh and Coulter. Good luck!

0

None 3 years ago

I think it's deeply ironic that this apparent 'defense of conservatism' is really very clear about the sources of conservatism's decline at Yale: as soon as the university stopped being all-white and all-privileged, the university turned liberal. Isn't that telling us something about conservatism rather than about Yale?

0

None 3 years ago

that's a bit of a post hoc fallacy don't you think? so yale becomes more diverse, therefore conservatism in the university disappears? would you be surprised to know that many of these "all-white, all-privileged" are, in fact, often liberal and many of those individuals who add "diversity" to campus are in some cases much more conservative? Furthermore, what are you implying that this is "telling us something about conservatism"? Because some of those white-and-privileged were conservative, we should now consider conservatism as elitist and out-of-date? Perhaps some of them upheld a perverse form of conservatism, though many did not. In any case, it is not smart to through out the entire ideology because a group of people who represent something you may dislike or fear once clung to it. The ideology itself is much bigger, stronger, and should always be heard.

0

None 3 years ago

Forget "conservatism," please. It has been, operationally, de facto, Godless and therefore irrelevant. Secular conservatism will not defeat secular liberalism because to God both are two atheistic peas-in-a-pod and thus predestined to failure. As Stonewall Jackson's Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:

"[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth."

Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).

John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com Recovering Republican JLof@aol.com

0

None 3 years ago

Yale wasn't always conservative just because it was white and male. The 1945 Yale yearbook (I think... the one with George Bush senior's baseball photo in it) has a student survey of political views and you'd be surprised what you find there...

0