Yale Daily News

Buttrick: Better sex with fewer hook-ups

It is apparent that there will be no consequences for the authors of the now infamous “Preseason Scouting Report.” If there is a silver lining to this unfortunate stunt, it is that the incident brought to light deeper issues in the Yale community, and perhaps with our generation at large.

The Women’s Center, with the support and alliance of several other groups on campus, including Yale’s Athletic Administration, Dwight Hall and the Black Women’s Coalition, hosted an event that brought together diverse members of the student body and administration to, as the title suggested, “Talk about Sex at Yale.” The talk emphasized not angry accusations but thoughtful discussion, not reactionary measures but workable solutions.

When asked to investigate issues of sexual culture at Yale, discussion members consistently agreed on one particular problem of campus life: Yalies don’t know how to date. We don’t know how to ask someone out during the day, while sober. We don’t know how to treat someone after a sexual encounter. We don’t know how to balance a hyperactive work life with a serious relationship and friends. Judging from some stories, a substantial portion of the population may not even know enough about basic anatomy to give any kind of pleasure that isn’t pure luck. We’re sure there are some dating-savvy kids out there, we just haven’t met you yet.

No wonder some people get so desperate. Hook-up culture assumes that sloppy, drunken sex every other Saturday night should satiate collegiate hormones for four years. Frankly, even if you’re just looking for the brief elation of orgasm, this isn’t the way to find it. It’s hard to tell your partner about your desires and preferences when you’re slurring your words. Would anyone prefer to wake up next to a surprise someone than a person he knows and likes? I don’t imagine that anyone performs better under the classic hook-up circumstances than in a well-lit, sober rendezvous. If good sex — pleasurable, healthy, delicious and perhaps even consistent sex — is the goal, we need to take a serious second look at how we approach the situations that get us there.

Beyond the failure of the hook-up culture to provide decent sex, it also reinforces incorrect assumptions about the fabric of our sexual culture. Even the assumption that everyone in the 18-to-24 range would like to be (or already is) sexually active prevents meaningful discussion for anyone who might feel otherwise. Many people come to Yale without receiving anything close to comprehensive sexual education, physical or emotional. There’s no shame in not knowing and asking questions.

We owe it to each other to start conversations, not to set up divisions. We have the Executive Committee to air our complaints about sexual misconduct. Why isn’t there a parallel forum for sharing positive sexual experiences and advice? Sure, the recent Gradification prank invited a little too much information, but exchanging dating advice and relationship tips to incoming freshmen might not be a bad idea.

This is an issue of sexual respect and sexual equality. Critics of feminism often claim that since the barriers to gender equality have come down, any remaining disparities result from women’s inferior efforts. But the removal of a wall does not result in full leveling of the playing field. Yes, co-education is now in its 40th year here at Yale. That still gives us a two hundred year handicap.

I am not saying that the issue of sexual culture at Yale should break down along gender lines. Beyond the negative liberty offered by hands-off inclusion policies, sexual equality could be achieved through structural changes that actively encourage collaboration and communication.

We need comprehensive sex and dating education. And not just a one-hour special during our first Camp Yale or the playful biennial sensation of Sex Week, but consistent and concrete programming available at every point of our on-campus careers. While serious issues, like STIs and sexual assault, need to be covered, we should also receive sex and relationship-positive materials. Suggestions for good date locations, sexual etiquette and basic anatomy could begin to solve the problem. We need to be as smart in our sex lives as in our academic ones.

Alice Buttrick is a senior in Jonathan Edwards College.

Comments

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Not everyone is looking for monogamy at this stage in our lives. To dismiss those of us who like to enjoy the occasional no-strings-attached sexual encounter as "desperate" is ignorant.

As for the "failure of the hook-up culture to provide decent sex," speak for yourself. As the saying goes, "if you're bored, then you're boring."

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

"We need comprehensive sex and dating education."

What, you didn't have any parents? Poor thing...

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Good article! Here's a start...one thing that might help is to elevate the tone of some of Yale's social events, such as the "Freshman Screw" dance. The apparent message as it exists now, is that if you haven't been screwing yet, get busy and do it. My daughter, a freshman, was not looking forward to that event when she read about it in the YDN this summer. The idea of a mixer is nice (and blind dates can be fun). Why not just call it a mixer? Also, how about turning "sex week" into a week emphasizing love and relationships, with a lot of romantic, fun, substance free get togethers for students who are looking for meaningful relationships? Lots of students (straight and gay) are looking for love, not just hook ups. And you're right, sex is better in a loving relationships (even if you're just kind of fumbling around at first).

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

The problems stated in this article are entirely the fault of the women's movement.

If men didn't fear that every single advance they make toward a woman is now somehow illegal, they would revert to what was previously considered normal dating behavior.

In today's de-masculinized culture, men are not allowed to ask out a woman with whom they work, who is in their class, who they just met, with whom they are friends, who is a friend of a friend of theirs, and on and on.

What's worse, men have been so indoctrinated in the mantra of 'no means no' that they will simply give up after a first rejection. Many of our parents and grandparents got together only after the persistence of the male partner chasing around his potential mate for some time.

Women don't always know what or who they want. Men (of all species, not just human) are good at "showing off" and being persistent in convincing a woman that he is the one over all other suitors.

But that process takes time, because women are biologically designed to find the best potential father for her children. So she puts men through their paces, to see what they have to offer. She gives a few a try, then makes her selection.

None of this is possible under the tyranny of feminism.

A man asks a woman out, she says no, and that's the end of it, lest he risk jail time for sexual harrassment. There's no flirting, no playful pestering, no 'secret admirers' or serenades under the window at night, no flowers or candy or trinkets.

It's all considered stalker behavior now, and therefore you're left with campus life of drunken hooking up and wondering why you're unfulfilled.

Watch an old corny movie like "Can't Buy Me Love" starring a teenaged Patrick Dempsey as he chases after the girl of his dreams. Today he'd be in handcuffs within the first 15 minutes of the film.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

I think you make good points about some of the unhealthy aspects of a 'hookup culture.'

But is it really Yale's place to provide a solution? To have Dean Miller - or her representative through some new initiative - explain how to pleasure a partner, or to suggest ways to spend a romantic evening?

We're adults, and while I'm usually not one to accuse Yale of hand-holding, I don't actually want the University explaining to me that I should hold hands.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Jennifer is so, so right. This is how it is, people. I really can't say anything to improve on her statement.

To all you sensitive, pseudo-feminist future stay-at-home dads, keep this in mind always: until you learn to act like a man, your woman will always be secretly unhappy with you.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Jennifer - amen. Thank you for that brilliant comment. You really should write an enlarged version of that and publish it in the YDN, if not the New York Times. It is an important perspective that needs to be voiced. And I think at Yale, in particularly, this is a major concern - at home, persistence was encouraged, it was a way to show a girl you were interested. At Yale, persistence is considered "stalker-ish" behavior. Why? Someone should investigate this.

I also commend Ms. Buttrick - you've accurately identified that the hook-up culture at Yale is less than ideal. But education sessions are not sufficient. Jennifer has identified the deeper cultural trend that engenders these problems. I hope she has the energy and courage to write an Op/Ed to get the discussion started.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Ian Kerner is the best when it comes to writing books about sex. He is a sexologist who actually has written books about how men can pleasure women (cunnilingus) and women can reciprocate. He has also written books about dating. I highly highly recommend his books. And as for the anti-feminists here, get a life. All the stuff "jennifer" described is creepy and harrassing behavior that I and women I know would NEVER want to be tormented with from a guy I didn't know. Good relationships start from friendship and are only possible through open, honest assertion of needs and standards. Women need to have an equal number of orgasms and men do, from sexual encounters--the gap in the % of men vs women who report having orgasms during sex is staggering, and it is not, as the pharmacuetical industry would like us to believe, because women just can't have vaginal orgasms due to sexual dysfunction. This is what Ian Kerner writes about. Women need to stand up for their own pleasure, and demand orgasms. That is the only way towards sexual equality.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

The theme of the Freshman screw may have been hook up related, but the concept in and of itself is basically a mixer where all the couples are supposed to be on blind dates. "Screw" being short for "screw your roommate," in regards to someone setting up their roommate on a blind date, and coming up with some inventive way of having the two meet.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

There was a time when people our age didn't have to sit through classes and tutorials in order to learn how to have normal relationships.

Hell, there are people our age RIGHT NOW who don't need to sit through classes and tutorials to learn how to have normal relationships.

These people have what is called "common sense".

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

jennifer you're totally right. if i don't seem interested in a guy initially, i'm often disappointed later when he doesn't continue to try; it's not that girls are purposely playing hard-to-get, they just may need a little time/a little more convincing. give it another go boys!

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Ms. Buttrick writes, "If good sex — pleasurable, healthy, delicious and perhaps even consistent sex — is the goal, we need to take a serious second look at how we approach the situations that get us there." My fundamental problem is with this very premise. As long as what is valued most is sex - as long as shows of respect, dating and its sundry games, and good suggestions about "basic anatomy" (huh?) are ultimately SELF-centered - then nothing will change. That people are nowadays either too afraid or too jaded to use words like "love" or "purity" in an article like this demonstrates, I think, that they're unlikely to put them into practice as working concepts. The cynicism of our culture cannot be amended by an article such as Ms. Buttrick's and cannot provide a stepping stone to the perfect sex life; rather, it is just such smooth talk which polishes the slippery slope we're sliding down in the first place, which ensures that any attempts at healthy relationships that aim at something higher will always suffer the gravitational pull of a societal tendency towards egocentrism. That is to say, it's a glib ideology like Ms. Buttrick's which has deposited us in the very situation she presumes we can avoid. Reinstating a culture of dating is no longer enough; what is necessary for genuine human happiness is to place love above sex (even if this means that NOT everyone at Yale will find it over their four years there - even if it means that a seemingly superhuman patience is required).

Yes, a vastly more beautiful way of life is possible than Ms. Buttrick's morally unambitious article concedes.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Jennifer's comment suggests girls are incapable of asking guys out. Maybe the feminist movement just needs to go a little further.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

"The problems stated in this article are entirely the fault of the women's movement." Well, you're very welcome for your right to vote, to leave your abusive partner, and to be paid the same amount of money as your male colleagues are paid for the same job!

"If men didn't fear that every single advance they make toward a woman is now somehow illegal, they would revert to what was previously considered normal dating behavior." Men don't need to fear that every advance is illegal. They only need to realize that their assuming, entitled, coercive advances are illegal (or at least undesirable.) Examples: asking a woman if she would like to go on a date with you, or asking if you may buy her a drink, are both legal and okay - even if you get rejected, at least you were decent about the asking so no harm done. Telling a woman that you are going to take her on a date, or buying her a drink without asking first, are rude and entitled, but often mistaken for "chivalry." Grabbing a woman by the hair and dragging her into the bushes... that's illegal.

"In today's de-masculinized culture, men are not allowed to ask out a woman with whom they work, who is in their class, who they just met, with whom they are friends, who is a friend of a friend of theirs, and on and on." Sure they are. (Well, except in places with no-coworker dating policies, I guess?) I How else did my classmates and friends ask me out? (FWIW - it's really crappy when you think you're friends with someone, and then months or years deep into the friendship they suddenly ask you out. Abuse of trust. Just ask me out to begin with instead of pretending to be my "good friend" with ulterior motives).

"What's worse, men have been so indoctrinated in the mantra of 'no means no' that they will simply give up after a first rejection. Many of our parents and grandparents got together only after the persistence of the male partner chasing around his potential mate for some time." News flash: that is stalking and harassment. You get to ask once (can't blame a guy/gal for trying) and then you need to respect the answer. I for one am really glad that some of the people to whom I've said "no" actually respected it. Those were good quality men.... whom I just didn't want to date. The last thing women need in our lives is dudes who can't take "no" for an answer.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

"Women don't always know what or who they want. Men (of all species, not just human) are good at "showing off" and being persistent in convincing a woman that he is the one over all other suitors." Really, speak for yourself. This woman (and many others) knows what she wants. At least guys who ask me out can be sure that if I say "yes," I mean it, and am not simply feeling too afraid to reject someone, or pressured into saying "Yes." As I have a general respect for humanity, I feel that we owe this level of forthrightness to each other.

"But that process takes time, because women are biologically designed to find the best potential father for her children. So she puts men through their paces, to see what they have to offer. She gives a few a try, then makes her selection." Oh.... really. Actually, some of us date men because we like the men. Some of us don't want children. Some of us do, but see men as whole people and not just sperm donors.

"None of this is possible under the tyranny of feminism." See you at the domestic violence shelter, sweets!

"A man asks a woman out, she says no, and that's the end of it, lest he risk jail time for sexual harrassment. There's no flirting, no playful pestering, no 'secret admirers' or serenades under the window at night, no flowers or candy or trinkets." Thank f'n god. Also, no dude is going to go to jail for sexual harassment. It's actually REALLY hard to get a conviction for even the most serious rapes and violent attacks, even when you have abundant evidence like security camera footage and DNA. Which is part of the whole, you know, feminist thing. We're trying to make it much swifter to not only nail rapists, but hopefully create a preventative and restorative community-centered justice, the feminism that makes no one WANT to rape, so that people don't rape... assault... or harass... in the first place.

"It's all considered stalker behavior now, and therefore you're left with campus life of drunken hooking up and wondering why you're unfulfilled." Well, I don't drunkenly hook up, and I'm pretty fulfilled. I met a really awesome wonderful man who is not only intelligent and good looking but also amazing in bed. He ASKED me on a date, and I AGREED to it, and he's been nothing but respectful and... why, he's even what you might consider "Manly."

"Watch an old corny movie like "Can't Buy Me Love" starring a teenaged Patrick Dempsey as he chases after the girl of his dreams. Today he'd be in handcuffs within the first 15 minutes of the film." Nah, just a lot of us would think he's a jerk.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

I'm sorry, but I call BS on this tired, old "Jennifer" line about how great it was when what we thought was "normal" courtship was, in fact, stalking, and most sex was just a little bit rape-like because "no" didn't mean "no." Please. We've all heard this ridiculous tripe a million times.

Reading lines like "Jennifer's" makes me so sad. Don't you people realize how tired and old and ultimately unsatisfying it would be for all men and women to play that old heterosexual game: skeezy male stalking behavior, pushy fake wannabe-manliness, and play acting in which the man must always play the aggressor and the woman must always play "hard to get"? It makes me want to vomit.

As far as I'm concerned, the unhappy sexual experiences that Buttrick highlights and the stalker-like "dating" behaviors that "Jennifer" dreams about are two sides of the same old coin: men and women who don't, or can't, communicate with each other honestly, and so fall back on familiar-if-unfulfilling behavior patterns and scripts instead.

Part of what feminism is about is the idea that men and women can actually talk to each other. We can actually see each other as people, with various needs and desires. You can hook up, or you can have a long term or lifelong relationship, but believe me, it's never going to work that well or be all that it could be if you insist on following some script rather than actually communicating -- especially a gender-based script that says all the men do one thing and all the women, another, and neither should try too hard to understand the other.

The experience of being liberated from those scripts is an amazing breakthrough. It's sad to me that apparently this is something some won't ever experience (or won't ever try).

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

This is a true story:

Many years ago, as a junior at Yale, a Senior girl from Holyoke conveyed the kernel and gist of what Jennifer wrote. She directed me to ignore feminists, even herself (she, apparently, donned a different persona at her college), that in reality,

Women. Want. Men.

Long out of college, married to a natural feminist, turns out the woman I mentioned--and Jennifer, and the woman I married--all thought the same thing.

Women. Want. Men.

For my daughters, my wife wants a father and that father to be a man (in the sense that we are talking here).

Yale Feminista: this message is not for you.

Yale men: I pass on this nugget for your long-term happiness, as well as that of your mate, and your offspring.

Re-read comment #8.

Feminista: flame on...

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Jennifer, I'd love to have a greater conversation about this some time. I think you're entirely wrong and have misguided views about feminism's effects on sexual culture in our generation. I'd like to prove you wrong right now and say coffee sometime, next week?

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Jennifer is basing her argument on what she perceives to be the natural, biological role of the female. In addition to being bad science, this sort of argument is known as an "appeal to nature," which is a logical fallacy. However, just for kicks, let's take her argument a little further. She claims that the female of every species needs to sample a few males before she chooses her mate. (I'm assuming that she's comparing humans to birds, here, because most other mammals don't form pair bonds.) However, she overlooks the fact that while the human female will choose a nice stable male with whom to form her pair-bond, she will also cuckold him whenever a male with better genes happens along. And yet in our society, many women are able to avoid cheating by making the rational choice not to. Indeed, they are expected by society to be able to stick with just one partner, otherwise they are called nasty names (slut, whore, etc.). So, Jennifer, are we really expected to believe that women can make the rational choice not to cuckold their partners, but are not able to make a rational choice about who they want to be with?

Moreover, sexual harassment is not actually a criminal offense. Sexual harassment in the workplace or school is illegal under the Civil Rights Act, and is considered a tortious offense, not a criminal one. Hence, you won't see anyone accused of sexual harassment in handcuffs or jail. Jennifer is blowing the culture around sexual harassment and dating out of proportion. People still ask each other out. Men still try more than once. I had one guy call me every night for two weeks: this is pathetic, not romantic. If a man is creeping a woman out, it's because he's a creeper, not because she doesn't know what she wants.

And to all of you who are claiming that women want men: most straight women do want men. But no woman wants a man who doesn't respect her.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

I'm also pretty certain that "Jennifer" is a misogynist dude pretending to be a woman and using the anonymous internet to project his delusional "logic" of why why all women actually WANT him to be a harassing, rapey creep.

I know plenty of women who are conservative and appreciate tradition, including traditional gender roles. But none of those women enjoy being badgered, harassed, stalked, and disrespected in the way "Jennifer" describes. In fact, they dislike it - because those are not traditionally ideal, upper-class, "gentlemanly" values.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

As someone who comes from a very conservative background... we are opposed to what they perceive as "second/third wave feminism." But we do not tolerate men treating women in the way "Jennifer" describes. It violates the "courtship" model of finding a marriage partner. The man asks the woman's parents for permission to court first (their decision is based upon if they like him and he is a man of God, and then asking the daughter if SHE likes him). A man doesn't even approach the woman herself initially! Let alone keep bugging if she wasn't interested.

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Sexual Assault Prevention Tips Guaranteed to Work! 1. Don’t put drugs in people’s drinks in order to control their behavior.

  1. When you see someone walking by themselves, leave them alone!

  2. If you pull over to help someone with car problems, remember not to assault them!

  3. NEVER open an unlocked door or window uninvited.

  4. If you are in an elevator and someone else gets in, DON’T ASSAULT THEM!

  5. Remember, people go to laundry to do their laundry, do not attempt to molest someone who is alone in a laundry room.

  6. USE THE BUDDY SYSTEM! If you are not able to stop yourself from assaulting people, ask a friend to stay with you while you are in public.

  7. Always be honest with people! Don’t pretend to be a caring friend in order to gain the trust of someone you want to assault. Consider telling them you plan to assault them. If you don’t communicate your intentions, the other person may take that as a sign that you do not plan to rape them.

  8. Don’t forget: you can’t have sex with someone unless they are awake!

  9. Carry a whistle! If you are worried you might assault someone “on accident” you can hand it to the person you are with, so they can blow it if you do.

And, ALWAYS REMEMBER: if you didn’t ask permission and then respect the answer the first time, you are commiting a crime- no matter how “into it” others appear to be.

~Colleen Jameson

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

why doesn't yale also teach us how to wipe our bottoms too? jees, since when is it Yale's responsibility to teach people how to date? You're grownups now (or at least you want people to think you are); figure it out for yourselves. If you don't like random hookups, don't do them.

0

None 2 years, 7 months ago

i want sex badly i am willing to strip!!!!

0

None 2 years, 8 months ago

Ah yes. There are no womens in campus who would ever oppose the agenda of the Yale Women's Center and Second/Third Wave Feminism

Right.

0