Yale Daily News

Updated: Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:52 a.m.

A A A

‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ protested

Staff Reporter
Published Thursday, October 2, 2008

Gagged and silent, about 40 students stood on the steps of Yale Law School on Wednesday to protest the U.S. military’s ban on openly gay soldiers.

From there they walked somberly to the Courtyard Marriott, where Navy and Air Force recruiters had appointments to interview five students inside.

For the second straight year, Yale Law School’s career services was required — by court order — to provide assistance to those military recruiters, even though the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy for gay soldiers grates against the Law School’s own nondiscrimination policy.

So...

#1 By Teo B. 10:31a.m. on October 2, 2008

Dean Koh and the Law School should show the true strength of thier convictions and just refuse the govt. money.

#2 By Teo B. 12:37p.m. on October 2, 2008

the med school would lose funding too

#3 By Hieronymus 2:16p.m. on October 2, 2008

Completely agree; I would respect *that*.

#4 By sf 11:08p.m. on October 2, 2008

yes, if they had the courage of convictions they would refuse money.

on the other hand how many yale grads join the military. I think if yale grads joined it would help make the military more progressive.

#5 By Hieronymus 12:14p.m. on October 3, 2008

#4

Couldn't agree more! If Yale wants the military to think the Yale way, they should flood the officer ranks with its graduates! Bring ROTC back to campus!

#6 By Robert F. 3:44p.m. on October 4, 2008

It is remarkable that a group of law students could leave the reporter with the impression that "The military enacted the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in the 1990s". DADT is a federal law (http://dont.stanford.edu/regulations/pl103-60.pdf) enacted by a Democratic Congress and signed by President Clinton.

It is perfectly fine for law students to seek to reform this law - indeed it is hard to imagine a good reason to exclude gay lawyers from the military - but their energy should be directed at Congress, not the military.

Sorry, but comments are disabled for this article.