Yale Daily News

Updated: Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:25 p.m.

A A A

PERU SUES YALE OVER ARTIFACTS

Staff Reporter
Published Tuesday, December 9, 2008

The Republic of Peru has quietly filed a lawsuit against Yale, officially turning a nearly century-long dispute over the rightful ownership of Inca artifacts into a legal battle, the News has learned.

Peru's 31-page complaint, accompanied by some 26 exhibits, was lodged in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on Friday by the Washington law firm that has represented Peru since last fall. In that time, Peru and Yale came close to signing an agreement that would have kept the parties out of court by sending some — but not all — of the artifacts excavated by...

#1 By (Anonymous) 12:35a.m. on December 10, 2008

The British Museum has managed to keep the Rosetta Stone from Egypt...

#2 By (Anonymous) 3:06a.m. on December 10, 2008

yo these fools be trippin

#3 By citizen of macondo 8:55a.m. on December 10, 2008

I hope Yale wins the dispute. Otherwise, they artifacts are gonna end up in the hands of thiefs and highest bidders down in Macondo. Should Peru win, it will be a treasure for the corrupt to reward themselves handsomely.

At Yale, they are safe and protected for generations to come.

#4 By (Anonymous) 5:16p.m. on December 10, 2008

As Barry Goldwater said of the Panama Canal: "It's ours ... we stole it fair and square!"

#5 By Anonymous 10:04p.m. on December 10, 2008

As both a peruvian and a Yale graduate, I had hoped for an amicable resolution. Yale, however, still sees itself Indiana Jones rescuing for humanity treasures found in Banana Republic. Peru is a sovereign nation with beautiful, safe museums where the pieces belong - not in Peabody's basement.

#6 By (Anonymous) 3:00a.m. on December 11, 2008

There is a great difference between the unethical withhold of the Rosetta Stone and the pieces of Machu Picchu. Hiran Bingam signed and agreement with the Peruvian government to return the pieces back to Peru after a few months of study in New Haven. Yale does not want to recognise that agreement and is asking conditions to fulfill its duty. In a few words is the same arrogance and prepotency of their British ancestors but luckily with a document signed that fortunately the National Geographic Society, the co-sponsor of Bingam's expeditions to Machu Picchu, does consider fully legal. Shame on Yale and all those ignorants that think they are the only ones who can take proper care of ancient objects that belong to their original nations!

#7 By Peruvian 10:50a.m. on December 11, 2008

How is possible?,What a pity! this prestigious University acting like a cheap thief!, they didn't honored the agreement one century ago,Indiana Jones and George Bush arrogance combined!...

#8 By George P. 6:37p.m. on December 13, 2008

George Patsourakos
The fact that Peru recently filed a lawsuit against Yale University for the return of Inca artifacts, excavated by Yale explorer Hiram Bingham III nearly 100 years ago, indicates the need for a compromise. Is Yale the rightful owner of these artifacts -- or is Peru? I would have to side with Peru, since the artifacts were taken from that country without payment for them. On the other hand, Yale has preserved these artifacts for nearly a century. Moreover, these artifacts probably never would have been found, if it were not for a Yale explorer. A fair compromise for the possession of these artifacts -- and one that would avoid a court settlement -- would be for Yale to return half of the artifacts to Peru, and to keep the other half. This could be accomplished fairly by having a representative from Peru and one from Yale take turns selecting each artifact, with a coin tossup to determine which representative would select first. Now that's a compromise that is a win-win solution -- and a fair one -- to this dilemma for both Yale and Peru!

#9 By Amy C. 6:10p.m. on December 18, 2008

Yale should defend itself in depth until the cost of litigation outpaces Peru's
$26.95 GNP.

Add Comment

You are not logged in. We do allow posting without registration, but we encourage you to register or log in to enjoy full access to our comments features!