Yale Daily News

Updated: Monday, November 23, 2009 1:03 a.m.

A A A

After ‘Yale Sluts’, a possibility for reform

Published Thursday, February 14, 2008

The Yale Women’s Center’s 26 pages of demands in response to the “We Love Yale Sluts” Zeta Psi rush photograph, released last week to administrators, represents the first positive step forward in this matter. Although its demands should not be categorically accepted, the document does contain constructive suggestions for much-needed reform.

The report begins with a harsh claim. “Misogyny is pervasive in fraternity culture at Yale,” the Center’s board members write. “Fraternity parties with sexist themes are a fixture of undergraduate life,” they add, and dress codes at the events...

#1 By (Anonymous) 3:45a.m. on February 14, 2008

Wow. I never thought I'd say this, but WELL DONE YDN EDITORIAL BOARD! This is an eminently reasonable and constructive piece. More importantly, it clearly articulates how the university can more fully support women without restricting free speech and without resorting to the insulting and degrading view of women that suggests they are incapable of taking responsibility for their own actions. It may have taken a couple of weeks, but finally a reasonable voice entered the debate over this incident. Well done.

#2 By Anonymous 10:43a.m. on February 14, 2008

I do hope the Yale Women center looks beyond the Yale Campus. I think the University owes every woman that is a student at Quinnipiac an apology for the SLUT BUS remarks.

#3 By (Anonymous) 1:15p.m. on February 14, 2008

I have to agree with poster #1. I am a regular basher of the YDN, and for good reason too, but you have to give credit where credit is due, and this editorial is probably the best piece of writing in the paper since the beginning of the term, if not since the beginning of Mangino's reign.

#4 By (Anonymous) 3:48p.m. on February 14, 2008

About time. Only wish this type of response was given last semester/every year prior. But better late than never - good job.

#5 By Chase O. 4:36p.m. on February 14, 2008

What would our campus do without the wisdom of Andrew Mangino?

#6 By (Anonymous) 4:45p.m. on February 14, 2008

I remember going to some parties with themes like that. Of course, Champagne Schoolgirls was in Branford. And Exotic Erotic was in TD, and don't forget the Corporate one was in Calhoun. Clearly though, the fraternities at Yale had a hand in planning these devious and pervasive events, with the advertising on Old Campus just waiting for freshmen girls.

#7 By Chase O. 6:24p.m. on February 14, 2008

It must be restated: THE WISDOM OF ANDREW MANGINO IS SIMPLY TOO AWESOME, TOO GREAT, TOO INTEGRAL to be contained to the NEWS VIEW. PLEASE, MAN, PLEASE APPLY TO THE WOMEN'S CENTER BOARD. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, THINK OF THE GREATER GOOD.

#8 By (Anonymous) 9:02a.m. on February 15, 2008

Really, Chase? Are you so devoid of intellectual honesty that when you can't make a reasoned argument about or against parts of Mangino's piece, you just resort to adolescent mockery? Why don't you actually engage with the piece instead of this sarcastic nonsense that only continues your pattern of disrespect towards the opinions of your fellow students?

Christ, no wonder the Women's Center is in such a bad place right now.

#9 By ovid 11:05a.m. on February 15, 2008

everything is just more fun when you are chase olivarius-mcallister.

#10 By Chase O. 12:50p.m. on February 15, 2008

My good man,

It is not that I cannot.

It is that I choose not to.

With gravity,
Chase Olivarius-McAllister
Branford '09

#11 By DF 1:27p.m. on February 15, 2008

please, someone, hire chase to comment on this website. she is a franchise waiting to happen. i mean, the girl is genius. an absolute genius. for the last week, my roommate and i have trolled through all the articles to see which ones she has zinged and the hysterical reactions she always provokes from people who just don't get it.

#12 By (Anonymous) 12:39a.m. on February 18, 2008

someone needs to take the shovel out of chase's hands.

#13 By (Anonymous) 5:24p.m. on February 18, 2008

Nah, it's more amusing this way.

#14 By Don Mei 8:58a.m. on February 20, 2008

Wow - I am so completely impressed with the Yale Daily News. I did not expect such balanced piece. Thank you.

With respect to the Womens Center, well, they've revealed themselves to be what they are.

Aparently they believe that the First Amendment is not that important. That a brief moment in time while a photo is snapped represents a hostile academic environment.

Unfortunately the Womens Center's views are typical of what modern "feminism" has become.

Modern feminism is not at all about standing up for "normal, heterosexual" women in the workplace or at home.

It is about a militant position that men are inherently evil. That the only use for men is as sperm donors. In summary, most modern femenists would rather men did not exist at all.

Strange . . . I wonder if the Yale Mens Center would stand a chance. There we could attend seminars about how to rip yourself from the enslavement of women. Hmm. Women, they're just a womb for (hopefully) our sons. Yeah that would fly.

Look in the mirror womyn (thats how they spell it, cant be a derivitive of "man") and see yourselves for what you are. Fascist haters.

Don Mei
p.s. To all those women who still consider femenism to be about equal pay for equal work, respect, etc. I apologize to you in advance. But unfortunately, modern feminism has gone far beyond your definition.

Sorry, but comments are disabled for this article.